Latest topics
Ongoing skirmisher melee and dispersal
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Ongoing skirmisher melee and dispersal
We had a situation where 2 opposing blocks of pikes were facing each other at 2 H charge distance but between them was a desultory ongoing melee of 2 skirmishers unable to hurt each other with 2 dice each.
If one or the other side's pikes charged would they pass thru their own skirmishers locked in melee , replace them in melee, and disperse the enemy skirmishers, then continue into the enemy pike?
or is the skirmisher melee an obstacle to moving thru and the pikes could only feed in as overlaps with the skirmishers remaining the main units in the melee?
If one or the other side's pikes charged would they pass thru their own skirmishers locked in melee , replace them in melee, and disperse the enemy skirmishers, then continue into the enemy pike?
or is the skirmisher melee an obstacle to moving thru and the pikes could only feed in as overlaps with the skirmishers remaining the main units in the melee?
stecal- VBU 3
- Posts : 233
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2015-02-06
Location : Philadelphia, PA USA
Re: Ongoing skirmisher melee and dispersal
How did the S end up in melee? I don't know of any VBU2 skirmishers with 2 dice that have impetus (S units with impetus are always VBU3).
In Impetus 2 if a melee produces no hits then both sides disorder and if already disordered take a hit. So even theoretically a melee of VBU2 S units could only last 3 rounds of melee or a 1 1/2 turns.
In Impetus 2 if a melee produces no hits then both sides disorder and if already disordered take a hit. So even theoretically a melee of VBU2 S units could only last 3 rounds of melee or a 1 1/2 turns.
Gaius Cassius- VBU 7 h.c.
- Posts : 1243
Reputation : 43
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Re: Ongoing skirmisher melee and dispersal
So skirmishers with I=0 can't charge other skirmishers? We did that wrong.
Also missed the no hits in melee disorder change. Thanks!
Also missed the no hits in melee disorder change. Thanks!
stecal- VBU 3
- Posts : 233
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2015-02-06
Location : Philadelphia, PA USA
Re: Ongoing skirmisher melee and dispersal
Nope you have it right Skirmishers with I=0 can charge other skirmishers see 5.7 page 28.
Re: Ongoing skirmisher melee and dispersal
Yes, you are correct Roundie. Another subtle change in the rules. Also 7.8.1. Always learning!
Gaius Cassius- VBU 7 h.c.
- Posts : 1243
Reputation : 43
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Similar topics
» Skirmisher Dispersal
» Skirmisher penalties
» Skirmisher question
» FP vs. FL in melee
» Multiple melee
» Skirmisher penalties
» Skirmisher question
» FP vs. FL in melee
» Multiple melee
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Yesterday at 11:22 pm by ejc
» House Rules - Impetus 2
Yesterday at 10:32 pm by ejc
» B class warriors.
Yesterday at 9:18 pm by ejc
» How Baroque deals with enclosed fields/ linear obstacles terrain ?
Wed Nov 13, 2024 7:44 am by Captain.Darling
» Anyone playing King David
Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:28 am by kreoseus
» Tournament rules and scenarios for Basic Impetus
Sat Oct 19, 2024 6:09 pm by Aurelius
» Routing at the Same Time
Fri Oct 18, 2024 8:21 am by kenntak
» Unrealistic missile results
Thu Oct 17, 2024 8:55 pm by kenntak
» BI2 Regeln auf deutsch
Thu Oct 17, 2024 7:14 pm by Leondegrande