impetus
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» House Rules - Impetus 2
Forming Shieldwall EmptyThu Oct 24, 2024 1:46 pm by kenntak

» How Baroque deals with enclosed fields/ linear obstacles terrain ?
Forming Shieldwall EmptyTue Oct 22, 2024 10:35 am by Ste J.

» Tournament rules and scenarios for Basic Impetus
Forming Shieldwall EmptySat Oct 19, 2024 6:09 pm by Aurelius

» Routing at the Same Time
Forming Shieldwall EmptyFri Oct 18, 2024 8:21 am by kenntak

» Unrealistic missile results
Forming Shieldwall EmptyThu Oct 17, 2024 8:55 pm by kenntak

» BI2 Regeln auf deutsch
Forming Shieldwall EmptyThu Oct 17, 2024 7:14 pm by Leondegrande

» My 15mm armies so far
Forming Shieldwall EmptyThu Oct 17, 2024 7:01 pm by Leondegrande

» Basic Impetus 2 in 15mm
Forming Shieldwall EmptySun Oct 13, 2024 9:52 am by Sun of York

» Spieler in D
Forming Shieldwall EmptyMon Oct 07, 2024 8:04 pm by Leondegrande

Salute 2024 Battle of Pharslus 48BC

Mon Apr 08, 2024 11:44 am by ejc

Forum members welcome to take part in battle of Pharslus Saturday 13th April …

Comments: 0

Ilipa 206BC Society of Ancients Battle Day

Tue Mar 19, 2024 12:54 pm by ejc

This year's SOA Battle Day is Ilipa206BC will be about a dozen games all re …

Comments: 10

Warfare battle of Cunaxa

Wed Nov 08, 2023 11:26 pm by ejc

Sorry for short notice we are putting on the above scenario on Saturday 11th …

Comments: 4

SELWG 2023 Thapsus 46BC

Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:29 pm by ejc

We will putting on the above game at SELG 2023 on Sunday 15th October. Forum …

Comments: 6

Colours 2023

Wed Sep 06, 2023 9:14 pm by ejc

Sorry for very short notice. We are putting on a game at colours on Saturday …

Comments: 0

Salute 2023

Sat Jan 28, 2023 2:49 pm by jorneto

Any Impetus games in this event?

Comments: 10

November 2024
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Calendar Calendar


Forming Shieldwall

5 posters

Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Forming Shieldwall

Post by Tartty Sat Mar 18, 2017 6:18 am

Does the line - 'Forming Shieldwall as a reaction to charging or shooting is automatic' -(Advanced Impetus) mean exactly that ? it's automatic like it or not !
Some in our group say yes and some of us say no thought I might get this cleared up once and for all Smile
The next line - 'i.e. like evasion, and works in a similar way'- seems to imply it's a choice ? Neutral

Forming Shieldwall Pic218959.jpg_zpsxvsmweyh


Last edited by Tarty on Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:02 pm; edited 1 time in total
Tartty
Tartty
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 633
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2014-05-19
Location : SYDNEY Australia

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by Zippee Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:32 am

Let's look at the full entry:
AI wrote:Some Heavy Infantry can create a Shieldwall as a reaction to a charge or to shooting or as a voluntary action. In the latter, voluntary action case, forming Shieldwall is the only action which is allowed during activation (with the exception of recovery from Disorder).
Forming Shieldwall as a reaction to charging or shooting is automatic, i.e. like evasion, and works in a similar way. It can be performed only if the threat is frontal, so if a charging Unit enters the ZOC before contact OR if the shooting Unit is within the projection of the front (the projected Zone of Control). Disordered Units can also form a Shieldwall. Once the Shieldwall is formed, a marker should be placed close to the Unit.

I see lots of use of "can" which implies choice rather than "must" which implies mandatory.

Now let's look at Evasion (as that's where we're directed for comparison):
AI wrote: Evading by CM, CL, CGL and S is optional and occurs after enemy fire or after the enemy declares a Charge. Obviously this cannot be Opportunity Fire or an Opportunity charge or a Counter-charge, since an Evading can only be performed by the inactive player. Evading is only allowed if the threat is frontal, i.e. if it comes, even partially, from the corridor created by the forward continuation of the two short-sides of the base (called “frontal projection”). Evading is not allowed as a reaction to a Pursuit move of the winner of a melee.

So here it's clearly mandated as optional and occurring after an enemy declares shooting or a charge [presumably the reacting unit must be the target]. And is not allowed against a pursuit. I'd think all this applied to shieldwall as it works "like evasion"

However also under evasions we have:
AI wrote:Evading of a Unit not on opportunity is subject to a Discipline Test. If the test is successful it consists of a full movement phase directly to the rear. Failure of the Discipline test does not cause Disorder

Nowhere under shieldwall is there a suggestion of having to make test, instead the reaction is "automatic".

It also appears (although it's not explicit) that it's irrelevant whether the FP is on opportunity or not; the implication is that shieldwall is allowed as a specified form of additional ZOC reaction under the given circumstances.

So to answer the question:
No it is not compulsory, it is automatic in that it doesn't require a Discipline Test. But is restricted as a reaction to enemy activity to its front not its flanks.
Zippee
Zippee
VBU 5
VBU 5

Posts : 769
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2014-05-19
Age : 61
Location : Lincolnshire, UK

https://www.flickr.com/photos/zippee/sets/

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by Tartty Sat Mar 18, 2017 10:32 pm

Yes nicely summarised Zippee bang on the money in my opinion.

I think some have decided to take 'automatic' quiet literally and not considered the other references.
Tartty
Tartty
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 633
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2014-05-19
Location : SYDNEY Australia

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by Zippee Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:45 am

Hah - "automatic" is not synonymous with "compulsory", so they can take it as literally as they like.

Accepted synonyms would be:
reflex; instinctive; spontaneous; natural; routine; mechanical; usual; programmed; inevitable; consequential.

Only the use in the form of "inevitable, certain and sure" could imply compulsory.

All that said I'd have no problem with it being made compulsory - if that's the tactic of the trooptype, then it should be utilised. I'm not sure that a unit should have the flexibility of not following doctrine just because the player doesn't like the movement consequences.

As it stands though it appears to be non-mandatory.

If I thought there was any way we were going to see an updated AI before 2ed I'd suggest that this was added one way or the other. As it is we'll just have to hope that 2ed makes it clear.
Zippee
Zippee
VBU 5
VBU 5

Posts : 769
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2014-05-19
Age : 61
Location : Lincolnshire, UK

https://www.flickr.com/photos/zippee/sets/

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by Tartty Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:18 am

yep - 'involuntary' is how 'automatic' has been interpreted by a few here....which is incorrect.

Not a big deal but good to get that cleared up Smile

Also ....how useless would this make shieldwall armies ? they wouldn't get off their base line. Pinned by fire in their first couple of turns half the time....ridiculous !
Tartty
Tartty
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 633
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2014-05-19
Location : SYDNEY Australia

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by Zippee Sun Mar 19, 2017 8:36 am

Tarty wrote:Also ....how useless would this make shieldwall armies ? they wouldn't get off their base line. Pinned by fire in their first couple of turns half the time....ridiculous !

Yes but that's because the whole shieldwall rule concept is deeply flawed!

Nearly all FP will close up and fight in a dense formation at the point of contact I really don't think we need a separate rule for it. I mean where's the synaspismos rule for phalangites?

I think the FP bonus on the CT is all that's needed to reflect this added solidity.

My preference would be to ditch the rule, however if it is to exist it should probably be compulsory as reflective of doctrine, it also needs to be rewritten with a cold dose of common sense! I mean if it's a reflexive doctrine reaction to entering combat, it should be just an automatic reflex to come out of it. Which means it would only exist in the instant of shooting or melee - yes just the FP bonus, that's all that's needed!
Zippee
Zippee
VBU 5
VBU 5

Posts : 769
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2014-05-19
Age : 61
Location : Lincolnshire, UK

https://www.flickr.com/photos/zippee/sets/

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by Tartty Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:21 pm

Zippee wrote:

Yes but that's because the whole shieldwall rule concept is deeply flawed!

Oh ok haha .......well that deserves a whole new thread probably.
Tartty
Tartty
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 633
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2014-05-19
Location : SYDNEY Australia

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by dadiepiombo Mon Mar 27, 2017 1:57 pm

shieldwall will be surpassed in Impetus 2. The idea for the new set (more based on reactions a la Baroque) is that heavy foot can decide to close ranks in some situations instead of countercharge (eg against mounted).
dadiepiombo
dadiepiombo
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1267
Reputation : 49
Join date : 2014-05-15

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by Zippee Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:13 pm

That sounds much better to me
Zippee
Zippee
VBU 5
VBU 5

Posts : 769
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2014-05-19
Age : 61
Location : Lincolnshire, UK

https://www.flickr.com/photos/zippee/sets/

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by Tartty Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:35 pm

dadiepiombo wrote:shieldwall will be surpassed in Impetus 2. The idea for the new set (more based on reactions a la Baroque) is that heavy foot can decide to close ranks in some situations instead of countercharge (eg against mounted).

I suppose the next question that will be asked is "will going into shieldwall effect movement for them in the next turn?"
Tartty
Tartty
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 633
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2014-05-19
Location : SYDNEY Australia

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by Zippee Wed Mar 29, 2017 12:30 pm

I deliberately avoided asking the nitty-gritty Smile

If it's a reactive formation change I would expect it not to have on-going consequences - the act of ordering a movement action should be sufficient to shake the unit back out of 'close order' but we'll need to wait and see.
Zippee
Zippee
VBU 5
VBU 5

Posts : 769
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2014-05-19
Age : 61
Location : Lincolnshire, UK

https://www.flickr.com/photos/zippee/sets/

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by Gaius Cassius Wed Mar 29, 2017 3:52 pm

I agree with Zippee that the shieldwall rule should simply be ditched. I think the +1 for FP against mounted is sufficient for modeling heavy infantry closing up.
Gaius Cassius
Gaius Cassius
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 1243
Reputation : 43
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by Cyrus The Adequate Sat Apr 01, 2017 4:13 pm

Gaius Cassius wrote:I agree with Zippee that the shieldwall rule should simply be ditched. I think the +1 for FP against mounted is sufficient for modeling heavy infantry closing up.

I'll add my vote to that - Shieldwall, in any of its iterations, never really delivered. It was supposed to represent how Dark Age troops allegedly fought, but as everyone points out, that's the same as just about all heavy infantry - minus the poets.
Cyrus The Adequate
Cyrus The Adequate
VBU 5
VBU 5

Posts : 566
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-05-27

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by dadiepiombo Tue Apr 04, 2017 8:40 am

I think consequences could be only for pursuing or as an alternative to countercharge (whose fail will be with no consequences apart from not countercharging). Foot against Mounted have no choice as countercharge would not be allowed.
dadiepiombo
dadiepiombo
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1267
Reputation : 49
Join date : 2014-05-15

Back to top Go down

Forming Shieldwall Empty Re: Forming Shieldwall

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum