Latest topics
» New Kingdom Egyptians vs Sea People Basic Impetus Game
Today at 12:11 am by Cyrus

» Shooting allowed ?
Yesterday at 4:14 pm by dadiepiombo

» New betas: Late 30YW Swedish and German Catholic
Yesterday at 4:12 pm by dadiepiombo

» Baggage Dimensions
Yesterday at 4:04 pm by dadiepiombo

» Hundred and One Years War
Mon Jul 16, 2018 6:21 am by Jim Webster

» I am trying some rules amendments
Fri Jul 06, 2018 10:01 pm by stecal

» Basic Impetus Laval, Pays de loire
Fri Jul 06, 2018 4:07 pm by Bobo

» next army lists?
Fri Jul 06, 2018 5:04 am by flaminpig0

» Anyone make custom mats?
Thu Jul 05, 2018 9:57 pm by Phillius

BI2 tournament - 12 May 2018 - CANCELLED

Tue Jan 23, 2018 10:26 am by RogerC

EDIT I am very sorry, but I’ve had to CANCEL this tournament. I’ve …

Comments: 9

Vapnartak. Sunday 4th February 2018 Knavesmere Stand York Racecourse

Thu Jan 04, 2018 7:54 am by Cyrus The Adequate

Hi Gents

York is the usual first event in the UK Impetus calendar. This year …

Comments: 28

Basic Impetus 2 Comp, January 2018?

Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:03 am by Aurelius

I've brought the confirmed details for the Basic Impetus competition to the …

Comments: 32

Vapnartak York Feb 2018- format options?

Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:26 am by Cyrus The Adequate

Hi everyone

I was pondering the options for the York competition and wondered …

Comments: 11

Impetus Competition Derby Worlds 2017

Sun Jul 02, 2017 4:42 pm by Cyrus The Adequate

There will be a 28mm Impetus Competition at Derby World Wargames on 7th …

Comments: 47

Impetus at Derby?

Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:29 am by Cyrus The Adequate

Anyone interested ? 7th & 8th October at a new venue - Bruntingthorpe …

Comments: 11

July 2018
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Calendar Calendar


Flank support - another q

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

Go down

Re: Flank support - another q

Post by starkadder on Sat Oct 17, 2015 11:06 pm

How many angels can fit on the head of a six-sided die? 

Once again, these discussions lurch into the teleological.

What if, just what if, this whole approach is flawed?

Most infantry, particularly close order, cannot see much around them. They can feel the push from behind and the threat from in front. The flanks are nice to know about if you are also on the edge of whatever column of mob you choose to adopt but do not overly concern you. 

Beyond initial deployment you are largely in your own world - personal and group. 

There may be an argument to be made for multiple pressures affecting the unit being approached or that is in melee. Rather than a +1 for the attacking unit, perhaps a -1 to the unit under a multiple threat?

This is not a real suggestion, by the way. Just an attempt to move this thing along because it is, frankly, tedious.
avatar
starkadder
VBU 4
VBU 4

Posts : 303
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-05-19
Age : 64
Location : Tahmoor, NSW, Oz

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Flank support - another q

Post by Empire in the sun on Sun Oct 18, 2015 1:18 am

Zippee wrote:
Empire in the sun wrote:
Cyrus The Adequate wrote:You don't get the +1 flank support - still get the additional half combat dice where appropriate.

Taking into account the above, the wording and Lorenzos explanation it does make sense, personally I see no need to play it otherwise.

That's an argument for dispensing with flank support entirely. It's utterly irrelevant to the discussion at hand.

Of course you get the support dice - but to argue that the unit fighting hard alongside you against the same enemy doesn't also protect your flank because you distrust it on some notion that it belongs to another command whilst a unit in the same command would support your flank even if not in combat with same enemy is arrant [sic] nonsense.



I simply support the notion that that the +1 to encourage group action under the guise of "flank protection" from the same command is a reasonable proposition.

If you have a problem with the rules man up and direct it at the person you have it with instead of using me as your proxy whipping boy.   Mad


Last edited by Empire in the sun on Sun Oct 18, 2015 5:08 am; edited 4 times in total (Reason for editing : only a fool gives a fool the time of day)
avatar
Empire in the sun
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 17
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2015-10-14
Location : Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Flank support - another q

Post by Empire in the sun on Sun Oct 18, 2015 1:24 am

starkadder wrote:How many angels can fit on the head of a six-sided die? 

Once again, these discussions lurch into the teleological.

What if, just what if, this whole approach is flawed?

Most infantry, particularly close order, cannot see much around them. They can feel the push from behind and the threat from in front. The flanks are nice to know about if you are also on the edge of whatever column of mob you choose to adopt but do not overly concern you. 

Beyond initial deployment you are largely in your own world - personal and group. 

There may be an argument to be made for multiple pressures affecting the unit being approached or that is in melee. Rather than a +1 for the attacking unit, perhaps a -1 to the unit under a multiple threat?

This is not a real suggestion, by the way. Just an attempt to move this thing along because it is, frankly, tedious.

Very, thank you Starkers for putting it in to perspective as only you can do.


Last edited by Empire in the sun on Sun Oct 18, 2015 1:45 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : blood pressure)
avatar
Empire in the sun
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 17
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2015-10-14
Location : Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Flank support - another q

Post by Gaius Cassius on Sun Oct 18, 2015 1:58 am

Empire in the sun wrote: I simply support the notion that that the +1 to encourage group action under the guise of "flank protection" from the same command is a reasonable proposition.

Flank support was originally brought in by Lorenzo to rebalance Impetus with respect to large units. With the +1 flank support bonus linear armies are given a better chance against armies with large units. Flank support also adds an incentive for units to move and fight in groups. In simple terms flank support is a means and not an end in Impetus. As such the particulars are open for discussion. I don't dispute with you Empire that limiting units in the same command to the bonus is a reasonable proposition. I hope that you would agree that expanding this condition to units of other commands is equally reasonable.
avatar
Gaius Cassius
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 815
Reputation : 24
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Flank support - another q

Post by Gaius Cassius on Sun Oct 18, 2015 2:05 am

Empire in the sun wrote: Very, thank you Starkers for putting it in to perspective as only you can do.

Actually I don't really understand why someone posts comments like starkadders above in topics that are as tedious as he says they are. If this topic has become this tedious then the best solution to my thinking is simply to stop reading any further comments (hopefully starkadder has already heeded this advice and will never read this comment!) Very Happy
avatar
Gaius Cassius
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 815
Reputation : 24
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Flank support - another q

Post by Empire in the sun on Sun Oct 18, 2015 3:08 am

Gaius Cassius wrote:
Empire in the sun wrote: I simply support the notion that that the +1 to encourage group action under the guise of "flank protection" from the same command is a reasonable proposition.

Flank support was originally brought in by Lorenzo to rebalance Impetus with respect to large units. With the +1 flank support bonus linear armies are given a better chance against armies with large units. Flank support also adds an incentive for units to move and fight in groups. In simple terms flank support is a means and not an end in Impetus. As such the particulars are open for discussion. I don't dispute with you Empire that limiting units in the same command to the bonus is a reasonable proposition. I hope that you would agree that expanding this condition to units of other commands is equally reasonable.

Of course it is ol'boy, however I'm not particularly open to being the target of ire that should/could be better directed, or preferably, not used at all.

avatar
Empire in the sun
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 17
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2015-10-14
Location : Australia

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Flank support - another q

Post by Gaius Cassius on Sun Oct 18, 2015 3:18 am

I agree that we should be kind to each other. We have a common enjoyment and appreciation of a really great game. Impetus has rekindled an enjoyment of ancients for me and my group that was lost years ago. If we dispute specifics it is only because we love the game so much.
avatar
Gaius Cassius
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 815
Reputation : 24
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Flank support - another q

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum