Latest topics
T Troops in Large Units
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
T Troops in Large Units
A large unit has mixed troop types (ie. FP with pike/spear in front rank, T in rear rank).
Does the unit conduct Defensive fire as a T unit, with the applicable modifiers on the discipline test?
When the T element is contacted on the side edge, does it fight in melee as per the front ranks stats, or as a T troop type?
Does the unit conduct Defensive fire as a T unit, with the applicable modifiers on the discipline test?
When the T element is contacted on the side edge, does it fight in melee as per the front ranks stats, or as a T troop type?
MyNameIsDennis- VBU 2
- Posts : 4
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2019-07-05
Location : Canada
Re: T Troops in Large Units
a) Yes if not attacked from the flank or the rear.
b) As the front rank.
b) As the front rank.
jorneto- VBU 3
- Posts : 249
Reputation : 18
Join date : 2014-06-16
Location : Portugal
Re: T Troops in Large Units
Thanks Jorneto. Do the mixed units of Pike in front, T in back also benefit from the pike units having no flanks, only a rear? or is that only for units entirely comprised of FP with pike?
MyNameIsDennis- VBU 2
- Posts : 4
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2019-07-05
Location : Canada
Re: T Troops in Large Units
Good question. Don't know the answer. Our group questions the whole idea of pike units of any type not having flanks.
Gaius Cassius- VBU 7 h.c.
- Posts : 1243
Reputation : 43
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Re: T Troops in Large Units
I think that only Wagenburgs count as having no flank or rear.
Where is that rule for pikes?
Where is that rule for pikes?
jorneto- VBU 3
- Posts : 249
Reputation : 18
Join date : 2014-06-16
Location : Portugal
Re: T Troops in Large Units
Page 44, 7.7 Fighting a Melee.
In the cohesion test modifiers it states:
"Pikes has no penalties if attacked on flank (but they have a rear)"
My understanding is they are still disordered, and lose rank bonus, but do not suffer the -2 on the cohesion test, but are still destroyed if they lose the melee.
edited after re-reading rules.
In the cohesion test modifiers it states:
"Pikes has no penalties if attacked on flank (but they have a rear)"
My understanding is they are still disordered, and lose rank bonus, but do not suffer the -2 on the cohesion test, but are still destroyed if they lose the melee.
edited after re-reading rules.
MyNameIsDennis- VBU 2
- Posts : 4
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2019-07-05
Location : Canada
Re: T Troops in Large Units
Not sure about this. The language for Wagenburgs and Pikes is very similar (no penalties). I do like what you are suggesting. Seems like a reasonable compromise from our end.
Gaius Cassius- VBU 7 h.c.
- Posts : 1243
Reputation : 43
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Re: T Troops in Large Units
7.2.3 is pretty clear about only Wagenburgs ignoring any effects of flank or rear charges. Pikes are only mentioned in the cohesion test modifiers (7.7) for a flank attack.
If a mixed (FP w/pike, and T) unit is contacted with a flank charge, does it fight as the front rank and ignore the -2 cohesion test modifier?
If a mixed (FP w/pike, and T) unit is contacted with a flank charge, does it fight as the front rank and ignore the -2 cohesion test modifier?
MyNameIsDennis- VBU 2
- Posts : 4
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2019-07-05
Location : Canada
Re: T Troops in Large Units
It seems there is an inconsistency between those two points.
One might think the pikes can put a squarish formation as to justify a no flank penalty. However my personal preference is for a flanked unit to be as much penalized as possible So, if I had to choose between those points I would go for the wagenburg only exception.
One might think the pikes can put a squarish formation as to justify a no flank penalty. However my personal preference is for a flanked unit to be as much penalized as possible So, if I had to choose between those points I would go for the wagenburg only exception.
jorneto- VBU 3
- Posts : 249
Reputation : 18
Join date : 2014-06-16
Location : Portugal
Re: T Troops in Large Units
To Dennis' question I would say that a mixed unit of FP/T would suffer the full effect of a flank attack and get the -2 regardless of where the specific contact is. Of course only Lorenzo can speak definitively on this.
Until Lorenzo says otherwise I am inclined to go with Dennis' interpretation of the flanking of pike blocks. See what the other guys in my gaming group think.
Until Lorenzo says otherwise I am inclined to go with Dennis' interpretation of the flanking of pike blocks. See what the other guys in my gaming group think.
Gaius Cassius- VBU 7 h.c.
- Posts : 1243
Reputation : 43
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Re: T Troops in Large Units
If a mixed (FP w/pike, and T) unit is contacted with a flank charge, does it fight as the front rank and ignore the -2 cohesion test modifier?
No, only full pikes Units
As for the main question: W have no flank or rear, so they cannot be charged on a flank/rear. Pikes have a front, so can be attacked on the flank or rear.
For Cohesion Test purpose only all Units have a -2 if attacked on flank/rear, the only exception are Pikes, that don't suffer this modifier in case they are attacked on flank (but they do if attacked on rear).
This makes the pikes still vulnerable on the flank (see other penalties) but a bit less. Mind that loosing a melee while attacked on the flank/rear for a large Units means the loss of all the Units forming it.
No, only full pikes Units
As for the main question: W have no flank or rear, so they cannot be charged on a flank/rear. Pikes have a front, so can be attacked on the flank or rear.
For Cohesion Test purpose only all Units have a -2 if attacked on flank/rear, the only exception are Pikes, that don't suffer this modifier in case they are attacked on flank (but they do if attacked on rear).
This makes the pikes still vulnerable on the flank (see other penalties) but a bit less. Mind that loosing a melee while attacked on the flank/rear for a large Units means the loss of all the Units forming it.
dadiepiombo- Admin
- Posts : 1269
Reputation : 49
Join date : 2014-05-15
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:03 pm by kenntak
» King David questions
Thu Nov 21, 2024 6:56 am by kreoseus
» First game of King David.
Wed Nov 20, 2024 9:06 pm by kreoseus
» ECW based for Baroqe
Wed Nov 20, 2024 12:01 am by ejc
» Tournament rules and scenarios for Basic Impetus
Mon Nov 18, 2024 3:07 pm by dadiepiombo
» Routing at the Same Time
Mon Nov 18, 2024 3:03 pm by dadiepiombo
» Warfare 2024 at Farnborough Nov 16th 17th
Fri Nov 15, 2024 8:12 pm by ejc
» My 15mm armies so far
Fri Nov 15, 2024 8:04 pm by Tartty
» House Rules - Impetus 2
Thu Nov 14, 2024 10:32 pm by ejc