Latest topics
7.7.3 Retreat of unit engaged on its side
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
7.7.3 Retreat of unit engaged on its side
Since I am new to Impetus I have a question with this rule. I understand how a side engagement starts. The charging unit was not totally behind the frontage line so it is treated as a frontal attack, not a flank attack. So unit A charges into the side of Unit B. Unit B loses the melee and rolls on the retreat table. Let say it rolls a 1 and since it is a foot unit it moves 1H in retreat. If this had been a frontal attack B would move (retreat) 1H directly back. But 7.7.3 says the retreat is "sliding across the face of the unit. How does that work? B would not move directly back, but back in an oblique direction? That seems that would keep B in contact with A. (I tried to load a picture but didn't work, sorry)
Also 7.7.3 says, If the retreat is not sufficient to completely disengage the enemy then another melee phase is fought. Does that mean right now, or when either unit is activated next?
/Jeff
Also 7.7.3 says, If the retreat is not sufficient to completely disengage the enemy then another melee phase is fought. Does that mean right now, or when either unit is activated next?
/Jeff
kazadharri- VBU 2
- Posts : 7
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2019-01-24
Re: 7.7.3 Retreat of unit engaged on its side
Assume Unit A is attacking on the left and Unit B defends on the right. In picture 1 A attacks B but doesn't get a true flank attack. In picture 2 B loses and slides down the front of A but still touches A at the end of the retreat. Another melee occurs immediately.
IMG_20190126_1959108[1] by Eusebeia2002, on Flickr
IMG_20190126_1959175[1] by Eusebeia2002, on Flickr
IMG_20190126_1959108[1] by Eusebeia2002, on Flickr
IMG_20190126_1959175[1] by Eusebeia2002, on Flickr
Gaius Cassius- VBU 7 h.c.
- Posts : 1243
Reputation : 43
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Re: 7.7.3 Retreat of unit engaged on its side
OK. That is what I thought. But what happens if Unit A had contacted unit B at an angle, say 30 degrees. Since you don't align the units how would unit B move in that example? A backwards oblique movement?
kazadharri- VBU 2
- Posts : 7
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2019-01-24
Re: 7.7.3 Retreat of unit engaged on its side
B goes straight back and A could pursue.
Gaius Cassius- VBU 7 h.c.
- Posts : 1243
Reputation : 43
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Re: 7.7.3 Retreat of unit engaged on its side
Thanks. That makes more sense. /Jeff
kazadharri- VBU 2
- Posts : 7
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2019-01-24
Similar topics
» PBW at engaged unit
» 7.7.2 Loss of Melee and Retreat of the defeated Unit
» Side and Flank Charges against a Pike Unit
» Retreat and evasion
» New contact of engaged unitl
» 7.7.2 Loss of Melee and Retreat of the defeated Unit
» Side and Flank Charges against a Pike Unit
» Retreat and evasion
» New contact of engaged unitl
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:03 pm by kenntak
» King David questions
Thu Nov 21, 2024 6:56 am by kreoseus
» First game of King David.
Wed Nov 20, 2024 9:06 pm by kreoseus
» ECW based for Baroqe
Wed Nov 20, 2024 12:01 am by ejc
» Tournament rules and scenarios for Basic Impetus
Mon Nov 18, 2024 3:07 pm by dadiepiombo
» Routing at the Same Time
Mon Nov 18, 2024 3:03 pm by dadiepiombo
» Warfare 2024 at Farnborough Nov 16th 17th
Fri Nov 15, 2024 8:12 pm by ejc
» My 15mm armies so far
Fri Nov 15, 2024 8:04 pm by Tartty
» House Rules - Impetus 2
Thu Nov 14, 2024 10:32 pm by ejc