Latest topics
» A few questions on large units, pilums and multiple melees
Revisiting Basic Impetus? EmptyToday at 2:06 pm by Gaius Cassius

» Interpenetration and Displacement
Revisiting Basic Impetus? EmptyFri May 17, 2019 6:19 pm by RogerC

» Measurement Question In Basic Impetus 2.0
Revisiting Basic Impetus? EmptyFri May 17, 2019 5:46 pm by Zombiefy

» Base Depth: 40mm vs 60mm for FP and FL?
Revisiting Basic Impetus? EmptyThu May 16, 2019 2:31 pm by Gaius Cassius

» Battle of Harzhorn Salute 2019
Revisiting Basic Impetus? EmptySun May 12, 2019 5:24 pm by Marcus Aurelius MD

» The Illiad = The Wrath of Achilles
Revisiting Basic Impetus? EmptyThu May 09, 2019 8:04 pm by ejc

» Charges/ counter chares
Revisiting Basic Impetus? EmptyWed May 08, 2019 2:32 pm by dadiepiombo

» Can a general move with a unit after attaching same turn
Revisiting Basic Impetus? EmptyWed May 08, 2019 2:23 pm by dadiepiombo

» Byzantine 28mm
Revisiting Basic Impetus? EmptyMon May 06, 2019 5:38 pm by stecal

Battle of Harzhorn Salute 2019

Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:13 pm by ejc

Our group is putting on the above at the EXcell Centre London being the SAlute …

Comments: 14

The Illiad = The Wrath of Achilles

Thu May 09, 2019 12:41 pm by ejc

We will be putting this game on at one of the Autumn shorws probably Colours or …

Comments: 1

The Battle of Apamea at Hotlead

Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:50 am by Gaius Cassius

Hotlead is Canada's leading Miniature Wargames Convention. It is held in 2019 …

Comments: 2

BI2 tournament - 12 May 2018 - CANCELLED

Tue Jan 23, 2018 10:26 am by RogerC

EDIT I am very sorry, but I’ve had to CANCEL this tournament. I’ve …

Comments: 9

Vapnartak. Sunday 4th February 2018 Knavesmere Stand York Racecourse

Thu Jan 04, 2018 7:54 am by Cyrus The Adequate

Hi Gents

York is the usual first event in the UK Impetus calendar. This year …

Comments: 28

Basic Impetus 2 Comp, January 2018?

Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:03 am by Aurelius

I've brought the confirmed details for the Basic Impetus competition to the …

Comments: 32

May 2019
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Calendar Calendar


Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by tico on Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:46 am

Perhaps at the time when (or even before) Impetus 2 arrives it would be good idea to revisit Basic Impetus and simplify few concepts of the main rulebook?

First coming to mind is CL evasion, and perhaps dispersion of S?

Not that those could not be addressed without official Basic Impetus 2. However, BI is excellent gateway to Impetus, and being free ruleset to test the game out it is greatly appreciated.
tico
tico
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 26
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2015-02-05

View user profile http://landandnavy.wordpress.com/

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by jorneto on Thu Feb 05, 2015 2:12 pm

The following links are for a Basic Impetus version based on Full Impetus “V1.5, 2014” and its reference sheet. Differences from the original Basic rules are highlighted in red.
New rules are evasion and a basic 2nd move. Other rules like interpenetration follow the standard rules as do all modifiers (no longer the need to remember two sets of factors).

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44026621/BI_V1.5.docx

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44026621/BI_QRS_V1.5.docx


Comments are welcomed

jorneto
VBU 3
VBU 3

Posts : 110
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2014-06-16
Location : Portugal

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by tico on Thu Feb 05, 2015 3:08 pm

Well, that was fast. By quick glance this seems to address pretty much all the concerns I have heard around BI.

Thanks!
tico
tico
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 26
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2015-02-05

View user profile http://landandnavy.wordpress.com/

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by 1ngram on Fri Feb 06, 2015 1:29 pm

First impressions are that this is a most commendable updating of Basic Impetus.  Impressive!

Personally I wouldn't have more that one movement phase but apart from that my only comment would be on the Evasion rules.  It should be possible for a unit which declares a charge and has the enemy unit(s) in front of it choose to evade, if a further enemy unit is now revealed beyond its normal movement, to either halt after its normal movement or to dice for additional movement in an attempt to make contact with that revealed enemy unit.  As it stands the rules seem to say it has to halt after its normal movement(?)

The only other comment I have so far is that (IMHO) units of Sk or CL with no impetus value should always evade.

I look forward to trying out these rules in our Ancient Campaign - even if my horse archers seem to have it tougher.

Very impressive - and much needed! Remember to put the links on TMP.


Last edited by 1ngram on Fri Feb 06, 2015 1:34 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : addition)

1ngram
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 96
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-06-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by jorneto on Sun Feb 08, 2015 10:52 pm

Thank you.
It was annoying to have different values for the same modifier or to have a slightly different rule for the same action depending on wether it was the basic or the full system.

It was also difficult to explain to potentially new players.

And to put it on version V1.6/2015, it needs only the addition of supported flanks and the removal of the warband depth bonus vs foot.

jorneto
VBU 3
VBU 3

Posts : 110
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2014-06-16
Location : Portugal

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by dadiepiombo on Thu Feb 19, 2015 5:13 pm

Though Basic Impetus is for free this doesn't mean that is not a copyrighted work and that everybody can publish its own version. Above all if adding rules from full system.

I'm aware that this was made with the best intentions, but it would be fair to ask the author first.

dadiepiombo
dadiepiombo
Admin
Admin

Posts : 999
Reputation : 40
Join date : 2014-05-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by jorneto on Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:20 pm

You're right, of course.
Eagerness made me overlook those matters. My full apologies to you.
I will also remove the files from the shared area.

jorneto
VBU 3
VBU 3

Posts : 110
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2014-06-16
Location : Portugal

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by 1ngram on Fri Feb 20, 2015 8:40 pm

Lorenzo, please give him permission to post the revised rules for Basic Impetus where everyone can get hold of them. After all, he is merely upgrading them to be more compatible with the full set. It would be a crying shame if this improved version were to be "lost".

In fact can I suggest that this revised version be added to the version available on the Impetus Website so that newcomers to BI and Impetus in general can avail themselves of both versions?

1ngram
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 96
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-06-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by tico on Sat Feb 21, 2015 10:04 am

I am inclined to think that perhaps if the changes are submitted to Lorenzo for review, he could then publish new official version of Basic Impetus with the changes that he sees fit and with all the respect to copyright.

I do think that BI - and Impetus - would benefit little update of BI.
tico
tico
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 26
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2015-02-05

View user profile http://landandnavy.wordpress.com/

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by 1ngram on Fri Mar 06, 2015 11:25 am

Lorenzo, are you going to respond to this query at some point? It would be a pity if new (and other) players were denied an updated BI even if you intend doing this yourself sometime in the future.

My hope would be that you would allow Jorneto to make his work available to us all.

1ngram
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 96
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-06-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by dadiepiombo on Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:33 pm

sorry, missed this post.

I am in contact with Jorneto to make an official 1.5 version.
dadiepiombo
dadiepiombo
Admin
Admin

Posts : 999
Reputation : 40
Join date : 2014-05-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by Bluebear on Thu Mar 19, 2015 11:33 am

Personally, while adding some sort of EVADE rule to Basic Impetus is definitely needed, I would be wary of adding a "second move" or other full "Impetus" rules.

Let "Basic" remain as a potential "gateway" into the full game by leaving a lot of things remaining there . . . so that we can say that while Basic Impetus is great, there is so much more in Impetus proper.


-- Jeff

Bluebear
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 6
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2015-03-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by 1ngram on Thu Mar 19, 2015 12:18 pm

I agree. Adding evasion, tidying up the 15mm/28mm base width anomaly, and altering the plusses and minusses to conform to the main set of rules would do the trick.

Maybe adding a simple countercharge rule as in Basic Baroque - this would certainly silence the critics of BI here who ridicule the fact that the impetus bonuses only go to the phasing player.

New Army lists if possible conforming to the unit types/strengths in the Extra Impetus booklets set out in such a way that armies of 35 or 50 or more VB can be fielded derived directly from EI booklets. Or even just a formula for doing so.

We have toyed with charging an extra point for units with VB of 6 or more so that such a unit costs 6+1=7 VB points, a unit of VB=7 costs 8 etc. These guys are just soooo powerful. Just a thought.

1ngram
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 96
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-06-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by dadiepiombo on Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:28 pm

Basic Impetus 1.5 will include evasion and some other rules, not necessary taken from Impetus.
Countercharge is too complex and I want to avoid any reaction/opportunity action apart from evasion.

The lists will be revised and I'm working to a specifi point system.
I plan to add a cover, an improved layout and include at least 100 lists in the pdf, with more to come maybe with a Campaign system booklet.

I am also considering to put a small cost (2.99 US) for the support of the project. In this way BI will have the dignity of a more official set by Dadi&Piombo.

dadiepiombo
dadiepiombo
Admin
Admin

Posts : 999
Reputation : 40
Join date : 2014-05-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Revisiting Basic Impetus? Empty Re: Revisiting Basic Impetus?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum