Latest topics
» A few questions on large units, pilums and multiple melees
Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) EmptyTue May 21, 2019 2:06 pm by Gaius Cassius

» Interpenetration and Displacement
Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) EmptyFri May 17, 2019 6:19 pm by RogerC

» Measurement Question In Basic Impetus 2.0
Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) EmptyFri May 17, 2019 5:46 pm by Zombiefy

» Base Depth: 40mm vs 60mm for FP and FL?
Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) EmptyThu May 16, 2019 2:31 pm by Gaius Cassius

» Battle of Harzhorn Salute 2019
Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) EmptySun May 12, 2019 5:24 pm by Marcus Aurelius MD

» The Illiad = The Wrath of Achilles
Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) EmptyThu May 09, 2019 8:04 pm by ejc

» Charges/ counter chares
Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) EmptyWed May 08, 2019 2:32 pm by dadiepiombo

» Can a general move with a unit after attaching same turn
Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) EmptyWed May 08, 2019 2:23 pm by dadiepiombo

» Byzantine 28mm
Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) EmptyMon May 06, 2019 5:38 pm by stecal

Battle of Harzhorn Salute 2019

Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:13 pm by ejc

Our group is putting on the above at the EXcell Centre London being the SAlute …

Comments: 14

The Illiad = The Wrath of Achilles

Thu May 09, 2019 12:41 pm by ejc

We will be putting this game on at one of the Autumn shorws probably Colours or …

Comments: 1

The Battle of Apamea at Hotlead

Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:50 am by Gaius Cassius

Hotlead is Canada's leading Miniature Wargames Convention. It is held in 2019 …

Comments: 2

BI2 tournament - 12 May 2018 - CANCELLED

Tue Jan 23, 2018 10:26 am by RogerC

EDIT I am very sorry, but I’ve had to CANCEL this tournament. I’ve …

Comments: 9

Vapnartak. Sunday 4th February 2018 Knavesmere Stand York Racecourse

Thu Jan 04, 2018 7:54 am by Cyrus The Adequate

Hi Gents

York is the usual first event in the UK Impetus calendar. This year …

Comments: 28

Basic Impetus 2 Comp, January 2018?

Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:03 am by Aurelius

I've brought the confirmed details for the Basic Impetus competition to the …

Comments: 32

May 2019
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Calendar Calendar


Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian)

Go down

Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) Empty Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian)

Post by Eques on Wed Dec 27, 2017 3:50 pm

What does a VD stat of 2/3 or 1/3 mean?

Also, how are the Sparabara & Immortal units structured, ie what does the "+" thing mean in the left hand column? Does it mean the unit is half pavise and half short bow, or does it mean a large unit made up of one unit of archers and another of Pavise Bearers? Or something else?

Finally, wouldn't they have Composite Bows?

Thanks

Eques
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 46
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2017-12-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) Empty Re: Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian)

Post by Nick B on Wed Dec 27, 2017 6:41 pm

The X/3 means its VD 3 if the general is attached to the unit.

The Sparabara/Immortals are large units made up of Pavaiases at the front with Bow to the rear but no penalty for shooting from the rear.


Nick B
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 59
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-07-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) Empty Re: Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian)

Post by Gaius Cassius on Thu Dec 28, 2017 3:25 am

Just to add that the new rules around a large T unit (T+T) in AI means that the front unit is a T unit and that all calculations are taken from the front unit. The back unit feeds into the front unit. There is no need to worry about a penalty for shooting over stands.

I personally would model the front unit with two ranks of figures, the front rank being spearmen with pavise and the second rank being archers. The back unit would have two ranks of archers. This would show the unit being predominantly archers with a front veneer of spear.
Gaius Cassius
Gaius Cassius
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 965
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2014-05-20
Location : Guelph, Ontario, Canada

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) Empty Re: Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian)

Post by Jim Webster on Thu Dec 28, 2017 6:56 am

Gaius Cassius wrote:Just to add that the new rules around a large T unit (T+T) in AI means that the front unit is a T unit and that all calculations are taken from the front unit. The back unit feeds into the front unit. There is no need to worry about a penalty for shooting over stands.

I personally would model the front unit with two ranks of figures, the front rank being spearmen with pavise and the second rank being archers. The back unit would have two ranks of archers. This would show the unit being predominantly archers with a front veneer of spear.

that's how I do it Cool
Jim Webster
Jim Webster
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 539
Reputation : 18
Join date : 2014-05-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) Empty Re: Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian)

Post by Eques on Thu Dec 28, 2017 1:19 pm

Why would Sparabara be any better at overhead shooting than other types of troop?

Eques
VBU 2
VBU 2

Posts : 46
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2017-12-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) Empty Re: Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian)

Post by Jim Webster on Thu Dec 28, 2017 2:03 pm

that's what they were trained to do
Jim Webster
Jim Webster
VBU 7 h.c.
VBU 7 h.c.

Posts : 539
Reputation : 18
Join date : 2014-05-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) Empty Re: Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian)

Post by Cyrus The Adequate on Mon Jan 01, 2018 7:13 pm

Eques wrote:Why would Sparabara be any better at overhead shooting than other types of troop?

They're not

The problem is the usual deep mixed formation is a unit of spearmen with some archer support, with the spearmen in the clear majority. The Sparabara "spearmen" are rather different - basically a 10 rank unit where only the front single rank has spears (and not very long ones at that) so at least 90% of the unit is bow armed - possibly as high as 100% depending on the source. Sparabara are actually bow units with a wicker shield wall, however unlike most bow armed units they did have some ability to hold their own against Hoplites. Making them deep bows wouldnt work because in deep units the casualties come off the rear rank first - which means they suffer disproportionate losses to their firing ability. So the solution that was arrived at was to allow them to shoot from the front rank, which has the advantage of actually working

Cyrus The Adequate
Cyrus The Adequate
VBU 5
VBU 5

Posts : 566
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-05-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian) Empty Re: Interpreting the Army Lists (Early Achaemenid Persian)

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum